Go-live acceptance

Separate RiskOS workspace review from production risk-system acceptance.

RiskOS can be reviewed as an AI risk governance workspace today. Production use with sensitive risk evidence requires backend authentication, tenant storage, encrypted evidence handling, immutable audit logging, backup/restore, and named buyer approval.

Acceptance sequence

Run these gates before any paid production handoff.

Action path

What a buyer should click during the RiskOS review.

1Open workspaceStart from the RiskOS workspace and use the CEO, risk owner, legal, and security role views.Open workspace
2Run adoption reviewLoad the buyer-safe review pack and confirm evidence, controls, decisions, and audit events appear.Run adoption review
3Check backend readinessUse the Trust Center backend check before treating any evidence or approvals as production records.Check backend
4Export board proofOpen reports, export the board packet, and keep external approval gates visible.Open reports
Review data

Use buyer-safe records for human review.

CEOExecutive reviewerApproves review continuation for approved review records and keeps production blocked until evidence and approval gates pass.
Risk ownerAnika RaoOwns the assessment, score rationale, control owners, and remediation queue.
Legal/securityDaniel Mehta / Maya ChenReview approval boundary, DPA, customer notice, model testing, incident path, and retention proof.
Hard boundaries

Do not overclaim the evaluation workspace.

Not authRole cards are evaluation viewsThey are not SSO, passwordless login, RBAC, or auditor access control.
Not tenant storageBrowser state is evaluation dataProduction evidence needs tenant database, encrypted object storage, retention, deletion, legal hold, and audit export.
Not certificationFramework mapping is readiness supportSOC 2, ISO, EU AI Act, and policy claims require buyer-specific evidence and review.